<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>The Washington Independent - U.S. news and politics - washingtonindependent.com: Comments by Tomas Gordon</title>
    <link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/person/12974</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Tomas Gordon</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Assuming the reader is &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NOT&lt;/span&gt; a Barama supporter (and even if you are), you might be interested in the following web page:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obama05.article" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obam&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s a link to a November 5, 2006 article on the Chicago Sun Times web site &amp;#8211; titled &amp;#8220;Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake&amp;#8221; &amp;#8211; which is pretty revealing. The reporters&amp;#8217; second direct question to Barama asks him whether he or his wife ever did any legal work for Antoin &amp;#8220;Tony&amp;#8221; Rezko, the Chicago slumlord with whom Barama did a sweetheart real estate deal that resulted in the $1,650,000 Georgian revival mansion for the junior senator from Illinois (at a $300,000 discount). Barama answered &amp;#8220;no&amp;#8221; at the time, but didn&amp;#8217;t he actually confirm that he had billed Rezko for five hours of his professional time during Monday&amp;#8217;s SC debate? I guess my concern is that his &amp;#8220;mistake&amp;#8221; conveniently netted him a house most of us could only dream of living in, and he&amp;#8217;s certainly not talking about donating IT to charity like the ill-gotten $40,000 in Rezko contributions his campaign has identified so far.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;There is a silly piece on abcnews.com showing the Clintons in one of the 100,000 photo ops they&amp;#8217;ve probably taken, in this case with the dreaded Tony Rezko. I couldn&amp;#8217;t see any real estate docs in Hillary&amp;#8217;s hands, but the top right of the page should display a film clip by Brian Ross that shows Barama&amp;#8217;s Chicago mansion in living color. Here&amp;#8217;s the link:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4192372&amp;#38;page=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4192372&amp;#38;page=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;There is also a hard-hitting &amp;#8220;print&amp;#8221; article by Ross that extends the Chicago Tribune story &amp;#8211; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4111483&amp;#38;page=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4111483&amp;#38;page=1&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8211; yet when George Stephanopoulos interviewed Barama this week, he barely followed-up on his softball question about the cozy deal. I&amp;#8217;m afraid most of the mainstream reporters are holding back on tough questioning about Barama&amp;#8217;s lack of integrity (as it was displayed with the Rezko &amp;#8220;mistake&amp;#8221;) because they don&amp;#8217;t want to be shut out of future interviews if he&amp;#8217;s the nominee, or God help us, the next President. We&amp;#8217;ve had just about eight years of an inexperienced politician with questionable moral certitude, and I really don&amp;#8217;t want eight more of the same, even if the guy is a Dem!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/commentary-a#content_15150</link>
      <guid>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/commentary-a#content_15150</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tomas Gordon</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Assuming the reader is &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NOT&lt;/span&gt; a Barama supporter (and even if you are), you might be interested in the following web page:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obama05.article" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obam&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s a link to a November 5, 2006 article on the Chicago Sun Times web site &amp;#8211; titled &amp;#8220;Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake&amp;#8221; &amp;#8211; which is pretty revealing. The reporters&amp;#8217; second direct question to Barama asks him whether he or his wife ever did any legal work for Antoin &amp;#8220;Tony&amp;#8221; Rezko, the Chicago slumlord with whom Barama did a sweetheart real estate deal that resulted in the $1,650,000 Georgian revival mansion for the junior senator from Illinois (at a $300,000 discount). Barama answered &amp;#8220;no&amp;#8221; at the time, but didn&amp;#8217;t he actually confirm that he had billed Rezko for five hours of his professional time during Monday&amp;#8217;s SC debate? I guess my concern is that his &amp;#8220;mistake&amp;#8221; conveniently netted him a house most of us could only dream of living in, and he&amp;#8217;s certainly not talking about donating IT to charity like the ill-gotten $40,000 in Rezko contributions his campaign has identified so far.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;There is a silly piece on abcnews.com showing the Clintons in one of the 100,000 photo ops they&amp;#8217;ve probably taken, in this case with the dreaded Tony Rezko. I couldn&amp;#8217;t see any real estate docs in Hillary&amp;#8217;s hands, but the top right of the page should display a film clip by Brian Ross that shows Barama&amp;#8217;s Chicago mansion in living color. Here&amp;#8217;s the link:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4192372&amp;#38;page=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4192372&amp;#38;page=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;There is also a hard-hitting &amp;#8220;print&amp;#8221; article by Ross that extends the Chicago Tribune story &amp;#8211; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4111483&amp;#38;page=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4111483&amp;#38;page=1&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8211; yet when George Stephanopoulos interviewed Barama this week, he barely followed-up on his softball question about the cozy deal. I&amp;#8217;m afraid most of the mainstream reporters are holding back on tough questioning about Barama&amp;#8217;s lack of integrity (as it was displayed with the Rezko &amp;#8220;mistake&amp;#8221;) because they don&amp;#8217;t want to be shut out of future interviews if he&amp;#8217;s the nominee, or God help us, the next President. We&amp;#8217;ve had just about eight years of an inexperienced politician with questionable moral certitude, and I really don&amp;#8217;t want eight more of the same, even if the guy is a Dem!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/commentary-a#content_15151</link>
      <guid>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/commentary-a#content_15151</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tomas Gordon</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
