<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>The Washington Independent - U.S. news and politics - washingtonindependent.com: Comments by Dave Stallard</title>
    <link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/person/14239</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Dave Stallard</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I remember reading this New Yorker piece, and being quite impressed by it.  Up til then I hadn&amp;#8217;t taken the idea of a Saddam/Al Qaeda link very seriously, but afterward, I felt I had to reevaluate that position.  I took the piece at face value &amp;#8211; it seemed so authoritative and so full of inside knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Yes, journalists and pundits simply must have their track records advertised, and their failures criticized.  If you present yourself as an expert that people should take seriously when they form their own opinions, then it is only right that they take your past performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/fast-an-loose-with#content_17536</link>
      <guid>http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/fast-an-loose-with#content_17536</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Dave Stallard</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
